Trump Scores Another Supreme Court Win And Boy Are Democrats Angry

In the grand landscape of “resistance” litigation thrown at the Trump administration, this case might not grab the biggest headlines — but it’s still another win chalked up for the administration, courtesy of the Supreme Court’s Monday order list.

Todd Harper, a member of the National Credit Union Administration Board, decided to sue after being removed from his position. He went after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, President Donald Trump, and several administration officials, claiming his ouster was unlawful.

Back in July, D.C. District Judge Amir Ali handed Harper a victory, granting summary judgment in his favor. But the Trump administration wasn’t having it. They appealed — and in August, the D.C. Circuit stepped in and put Judge Ali’s ruling on ice with a stay pending appeal.

Harper then tried to leapfrog the process and asked the Supreme Court to intervene directly, filing a petition for certiorari in September.

 

We’re all used to the screaming headlines when the Supreme Court hands down a major ruling or drops an emergency-docket order. But what most people don’t realize is that the Court quietly moves a lot of business through its Monday order lists — the routine, nuts-and-bolts housekeeping that rarely gets mainstream attention.

SENATE JUST SHOCKED TRUMP 79-18

The U.S. Senate overwhelmingly blocked Senator Bernie Sanders’ attempt to halt a $20 billion arms sale to Israel, despite growing concerns over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Sanders argued that continued arms transfers — including bombs and tank rounds — could violate U.S. laws amid ris ing civilian casualties, now over 43,000 according to Gaza officials.

His resolutions, backed by a few progressive senators, were defeated by wide margins, reflecting strong bipartisan support for Israel. While the proposals failed, they ignited debate over America’s role in foreign conflicts and the oversight of military aid.

The U.S. Senate overwhelmingly blocked Senator Bernie Sanders’ attempt to halt a $20 billion arms sale to Israel, despite growing concerns over the humanitarian

crisis in Gaza. Sanders argued that continued arms transfers — including bombs and tank rounds — could violate U.S. laws amid rising civilian casualties, now over 43,000 according to Gaza officials.

The email, discovered among the trove of Epstein communications released by House Republicans

BOMBSHELL: Leaked Epstein Emails Reveal Hillary Clinton’s Secret Affair

Jeffrey Epstein’s sordid past continues to haunt the Democratic elite. In the latest stunning development, an unearthed email from 2016 has surfaced, allegedly linking Hillary Clinton to a sexual relationship with the late Vince Foster, a longtime Clinton confidant who died under circumstances that have long aroused suspicion.

The email, discovered among the trove of Epstein communications released by House Republicans, includes a message to disgraced journalist Michael Wolff that cryptically states, “hillary doing naughties with Vince.”

The email, dated May 25, 2016, was in response to Wolff’s request for a “thumbnail” summary on “Nussbaum/Foster,” referencing Bernard Nussbaum, the former White House Counsel, and Vince Foster, who served as Deputy White House Counsel before his untimely death in 1993. Epstein’s response strongly implies that Hillary Clinton had an inappropriate relationship with Foster while serving in the White House.

Whether salacious gossip or a glimpse into the moral depravity of Washington’s elite, the implications are deeply troubling.

Foster was a key figure in the Clinton White House and a close friend of both Hillary and Bill Clinton. His death in Fort Marcy Park, officially ruled a suicide, has been questioned for decades by conservative watchdogs and independent investigators.

For many, the lack of clarity, the inconsistencies at the crime scene, and the political proximity to the Clintons make the official story difficult to accept.

Now, with Epstein’s name in the mix, the situation becomes far more sinister. Epstein, a convicted sex offender with a web of connections spanning global elites, appears to have possessed insider knowledge of highly sensitive matters. The idea that he would so casually reference Hillary Clinton’s alleged “naughties” with Foster suggests he knew more than he was ever willing—or able—to say publicly.

Foster’s death was originally described by investigators as a textbook suicide. Yet the physical evidence told another story. Paramedics who arrived at the scene reported the body was found in an odd position, inconsistent with the force and recoil of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The bullet was never recovered. There were no fingerprints on the gun. No brain matter at the scene. No blood pooling under his head, even though he was supposedly shot in the mouth.

Experts have long questioned how a high-powered .38 caliber revolver could leave so little evidence at the scene. Foster was reportedly found with the gun in his right hand and his thumb jammed in the trigger guard—an anatomically awkward position given the trauma his body would have sustained from the blast. Yet the media accepted the explanation without serious challenge.

Journalist Christopher Ruddy, among others, raised alarms in the 1990s, pointing out these glaring inconsistencies. He argued the crime scene looked staged and the body had been moved. Ruddy’s analysis was dismissed by the media, labeled a conspiracy theory by liberal pundits, and buried under waves of Clintonian spin. But now, with Epstein’s email casting a new light, those old questions demand new answers.

The Clinton machine is known for its ability to deflect, deny, and destroy opposition. This wouldn’t be the first time a Clinton scandal was wiped from the headlines. But this time, the accusation isn’t coming from political rivals or disgruntled former staffers. It’s coming from Epstein—a man with deep ties to the most powerful figures in the world, including the Clintons themselves.