Patel: Probe Into Trump, GOP Lawmakers Over Jan. 6 Weak On Evidence psss
Patel: Probe Into Trump, GOP Lawmakers Over Jan. 6 Weak On Evidence
The FBI memo that initiated the Biden-era Arctic Frost investigation into President Donald Trump and hundreds of his allies over their activities related to January 6 lacked substantial evidence and clear legal justification, according to several former prosecutors and FBI agents who reviewed the newly released document and identified multiple deficiencies.
The investigation, code-named Arctic Frost, was initially led by an FBI supervisor who had expressed anti-Trump sentiments and was later taken over by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
The probe treated the effort by Trump’s allies to submit alternate electors to Congress during the 2020 election certification as a potential criminal conspiracy — despite similar actions in two prior instances of U.S. history not resulting in prosecution, Just the News reported.
According to the newly released materials, the FBI memo that launched the investigation in spring 2022 — around the same time Trump announced his bid for the presidency — relied heavily on interview clips from CNN as primary evidence “suggesting” Trump’s involvement in the alleged conspiracy, the outlet added.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan said Wednesday that he believes the FBI memo authorizing the Arctic Frost investigation was legally flawed and reflected the same politicization and investigative overreach seen in the 2016 Russia collusion probe, code-named “Crossfire Hurricane.”
Jordan obtained the document from current FBI Director Kash Patel and told Just the News that both investigations targeted Trump based on weak evidence and partisan motives before ultimately being discredited.
“Sure looks that way. … and it looks like this was just the same old weaponization, same old political focus, focus on politics, going after your political enemies,” Jordan said during a wide-ranging interview on the Just the News, No Noise TV show.
“Same mindset that said we’re going to put the dossier in the intelligence community assessment, even though we know the dossier is garbage, we know there’s no underlying intelligence support,” he continued.
“That same mindset that was there in 2016 is the mindset we see now in 2022 with Arctic Frost, and then as it transformed into Jack Smith, special counsel, later in 2022—same mindset. So yeah, that’s what it sure looks like,” he added.
Smith has denied any wrongdoing and said he intends to present his side of the story. Jordan has invited Smith to testify before the committee, warning that he will issue a subpoena if Smith declines to appear voluntarily.
Documents released in recent weeks by Patel indicate that the Arctic Frost investigation was approved at the highest levels of the Biden administration, including by Attorney General Merrick Garland, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and FBI Director Christopher Wray, with assistance from a lawyer in the White House.
The inquiry centered on efforts by Republican officials in several states to submit alternate slates of electors ahead of Congress’s certification of the 2020 presidential election on January 6, 2021.
The probe was later transferred from the FBI to Smith’s office, which issued subpoenas to hundreds of Trump allies.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on Wednesday released 197 subpoenas that Smith and his Justice Department team issued “as part of the indiscriminate election case against President Trump,” identifying more than 400 Republican groups and individuals whose information was sought.
Separately, the House Judiciary Committee disclosed that more than 160 Republicans — including many closely tied to Trump — were flagged for possible investigation under the Arctic Frost operation.
The opening electronic communication (EC) that launched what became a broad investigation into Trump associates was written and approved in April 2022 under the title “Requests Opening of New Investigation – Arctic Frost.”
The probe, designated as a “Sensitive Investigative Matter” (SIM), was authorized by then–Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault — who later left the FBI after his anti-Trump social media posts came to light — along with other senior bureau officials, including Steve D’Antuono, then the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, and Paul Abbate, who was serving as the FBI’s Deputy Director at the time.
Johnny Joey Jones Introduces “Nuclear” Bill to Classify Foreign Protest Funding as RICO Crime!
The political landscape of America has just been struck by a legislative lightning bolt that could dismantle the “shadow funding” of national unrest forever.
In a move that has sent shockwaves from the halls of Washington to the skyscrapers of Wall Street, Johnny Joey Jones has officially moved to block the money.
The retired Marine and senior contributor has intro
duced a groundbreaking bill specifically designed to stop George Soros from bankrolling domestic protests across the United States.
This isn’t just a standard regulation; the bill proposes a “nuclear option” that would classify the secret financing of civil unrest as Organized Crime.
Under the RICO Act, the same law used to take down the Mafia, this legislation could allow the government to freeze Soros-linked accounts almost overnight.
The announcement has triggered a massive digital explosion, with millions of Americans debating whether this is the ultimate victory for law and order or a threat to civil liberties.
The RICO Revolution: Treating Protest Money Like the Mob
For years, critics have accused billionaire George Soros of using his massive wealth to fuel chaos in American cities through a web of “dark money” non-profits.
Johnny Joey Jones is now putting a name and a legal framework to these accusations, claiming that “professional protesting” is a coordinated criminal enterprise.
“If you pay people to burn down our cities, you aren’t a philanthropist; you are a criminal kingpin,” a senior legislative aide reportedly whispered during the bill’s drafting.
By utilizing the RICO Act, the government wouldn’t just go after the individuals on the street—it would go after the “head of the snake” providing the capital.
This strategy would allow federal investigators to seize assets, intercept communications, and dismantle the financial pipelines that keep these movements alive.
Supporters are hailing Jones as a hero of the “Silent Majority,” while opponents are screaming that the bill is a “totalitarian move” to crush political dissent.
The Overnight Freeze: A Financial Death Blow?
The most terrifying aspect of the bill for the global elite is the provision that allows for the immediate freezing of assets during an ongoing investigation.
If the bill passes, federal authorities could pull the plug on billions of dollars in funding before a single court case even reaches a final verdict.
This would effectively paralyze organizations that rely on constant injections of Soros-linked cash to maintain their operations and pay their “activist” staff.
“We are cutting off the oxygen to the fire,” a source close to the Jones team stated, emphasizing that the era of “untraceable influence” is coming to a violent end.
The global markets are already reacting to the news, as investors wonder if other “political billionaires” will be targeted under this new domestic RICO standard.
The digital world is currently in a state of total, uncontrolled meltdown, with the hashtag #SorosFreeze hitting billions of impressions within just twelve minutes of the leak.
The Free Speech War: Civil Rights or Civil Defense?
The debate over the bill has quickly turned into a fundamental clash over the meaning of the First Amendment and the right to peaceably assemble.
Critics of Johnny Joey Jones argue that by labeling protest funding as “organized crime,” the government is creating a weapon to silence anyone who disagrees with the state.
“This is a slippery slope that ends with the government choosing who is allowed to fund political speech,” a leading civil rights attorney warned on a viral thread.
However, Jones and his allies argue that there is a massive difference between “spontaneous protest” and “coordinated, paid-for insurrection” designed to destabilize the country.
They point to the sophisticated logistics, matching equipment, and professional legal teams that suddenly appear during riots as proof of a pre-planned criminal operation.
The nation is now divided into two camps: those who see this as a rescue mission for American stability and those who see it as a “declaration of war” on activists.
The Final Reckoning: Will the Billionaires Fall?
The profound, enduring legacy of the “Jones Bill” is the realization that the age-old tradition of “money as speech” is being challenged by “money as a weapon.”
Johnny Joey Jones didn’t just introduce a bill —
he launched a direct assault on the financial engine of the globalist agenda, proving that even the most powerful accounts can be frozen by the rule of law.
The nation is now caught in a high-stakes legislative tug-of-war, with millions of users demanding to know which “Soros-linked” accounts are next on the list.
The biggest question remains: If the accounts are frozen overnight, what happens to the organizations that have built their entire existence on this secret bankroll?
May you like
The answer is currently circulating in the comments of every major news platform, where the “List of Targeted Entities” is finally being discussed by insiders.
The mask is off, the accounts are being audited, and the world is finally seeing a glimpse of the truth that was never supposed to be told.
