MUST WATCH: CNN Blasted Barrack Hussein Obama After He…psss
MUST WATCH: CNN Blasted Barrack Hussein Obama After He…
CNN’s Abby Phillip stunned viewers on Saturday when she openly criticized former President Barack Obama for refusing to credit President Donald Trump for brokering the historic peace deal between Israel and Hamas.
Obama had expressed relief that “an end to the conflict is within sight,” but notably left out any mention of Trump — the man responsible for negotiating the deal that ended years of bloodshed.
“Honestly, it’s not unfair to say, if President Obama is going to write a whole post about a peace deal, maybe he should acknowledge the president who brokered it,” Phillip said, breaking ranks with her usual liberal colleagues.
Her candid statement immediately drew attention online, with conservatives applauding her honesty and some CNN viewers even admitting it was “refreshing” to see a mainstream media figure speak truthfully about Trump’s accomplishments.
Phillip’s remarks came just two days after Obama’s post was widely criticized by Trump supporters, including Donald Trump Jr., who fired back on X with a short but powerful message: “I’ll finish it for you. ‘Thank you, Donald Trump.’”
The younger Trump’s post quickly went viral, echoing the sentiment of millions of Americans and Israelis who see Trump’s leadership as instrumental in achieving peace in the Middle East.
During the same CNN segment, Jamal Simmons, former communications director for Kamala Harris, surprisingly agreed with Phillip’s assessment. “If Donald Trump gets a peace deal, he deserves the credit,” Simmons said.
He later added that the next steps should involve “self-determination for the people who live in Gaza” and “more security for the people who live in Israel” — but the acknowledgment of Trump’s achievement was clear.
The peace deal, announced by Trump earlier in the week, guarantees the return of 48 hostages from Gaza, with 20 confirmed to be alive. The announcement brought relief to families and marked a major diplomatic victory for the Trump administration.
This deal comes just over two years after Hamas terrorists launched a brutal attack that killed 1,200 Israelis and took hundreds of hostages, an act that reignited deep divisions in the region.
While Obama chose to gloss over Trump’s role, ordinary citizens in Israel were far more generous with their gratitude. Over the weekend, hundreds of thousands gathered in Tel Aviv, waving American and Israeli flags, chanting “Thank you, Trump!”
The powerful display of appreciation served as a stark reminder of who actually took action to bring peace — while others merely talked.
Trump’s allies were quick to point out the double standard in how the media treats Obama compared to Trump. When Obama signed the Iran deal — a move that empowered Iran’s regime — the media hailed him as a diplomatic genius. But when Trump actually delivers peace, he’s ignored.
Phillip’s comment, however brief, broke through that wall of bias. By saying what many already knew, she legitimized what conservatives have been saying for years: Trump’s foreign policy record speaks for itself.
The peace agreement, described by political observers as “unthinkable just a few years ago,” is now being recognized by analysts worldwide as one of the greatest diplomatic feats in recent history.
Under Trump’s leadership, America brokered the Abraham Accords, restored alliances, and now helped end hostilities between Israel and Hamas — a goal no previous administration managed to achieve.
Yet, the Obama post revealed a continued unwillingness among Democrats to give Trump any credit, even when his policies save lives and bring stability.
The exchange took place during CNN’s “Table for Five,” where Phillip discussed Obama’s recent post on X about the ceasefire agreement.
What made Phillip’s statement stand out was that it came from CNN — a network long known for its adversarial coverage of Trump. It’s rare for anyone on that platform to acknowledge his achievements so plainly.
Social media erupted following the broadcast, with conservative influencers praising Phillip for “telling the truth for once.” Others joked that “hell must have frozen over” since CNN finally gave Trump credit.
Political strategist Steve Cortes weighed in on X, writing, “Abby Phillip said what every fair-minded person knows — Trump got it done. Peace through strength works.”
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.
“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.
Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.
“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.
Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.
What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.
In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.
Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.
May you like
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.
