Ilhan Omar Under Investigation for Immigration Fraud: Trump Border Czar pssss
Ilhan Omar Under Investigation for Immigration Fraud: Trump Border Czar
WASHINGTON — Tom Homan, President Donald Trump’s border czar, said the administration is reviewing allegations of possible immigration fraud involving Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN), reigniting a long-running and highly contentious political controversy.
Speaking Monday on Newsmax, Homan said he recently discussed the matter with a senior fraud investigator from Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and is now pursuing a review of relevant immigration records.
“I just got advised by a fraud investigator the other day on that,” Homan said. “I asked the question, can we review the files? You know, there was immigration fraud involved. The statute of limitations became an issue in the last four years when this was first brought up.”
Homan added that the investigator—whom he described as one of HSI’s most experienced—believes the case merits examination.
“We’re pulling the records now, pulling the files, and we’re looking at it,” Homan said. “There’s no doubt he’d review the file. So I’m running that down this week, and we’ll see.”
Longstanding Allegations, Firm Denials
The allegations referenced by Homan stem from claims promoted by President Trump and some conservative figures that Omar married her brother in order to obtain U.S. immigration benefits—an accusation Omar has repeatedly and forcefully denied.
Omar was born in Somalia in 1982. Her family fled the country during the civil war when she was eight years old, spending several years in a refugee camp in Kenya before being granted asylum and arriving in the United States in 1995. She became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2000 at the age of 17.
Newsweek reached out to Omar’s office for comment.
Trump Escalates Rhetoric
President Trump revived the allegation during a rally this week, using inflammatory language while calling for Omar’s removal from the country. His remarks drew immediate backlash from Democrats and civil rights groups, who condemned them as racist and dangerous.
Omar responded on X, writing, “Trump’s obsession with me is beyond weird. He needs serious help. Since he has no economic policies to tout, he’s resorting to regurgitating bigoted lies instead. He continues to be a national embarrassment.”
DHS Response
In a statement to Newsweek, Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin emphasized that DHS treats all marriage fraud allegations seriously, while stopping short of confirming any specific investigation into Omar.
“Our message is clear: do not engage in marriage fraud or you will face the consequences of American justice including severe fines, arrest, jail time and deportation,” McLaughlin said. “Marriage fraud undermines the integrity of America’s immigration system.”
Immigration Enforcement Context
The renewed controversy comes as immigration enforcement remains a central focus of the Trump administration. DHS announced this week that enforcement operations have resulted in more than 605,000 deportations since January 20, with an additional 1.9 million individuals reportedly self-deporting voluntarily since January 2025.
Trump’s comments also arrive amid heightened rhetoric targeting Minnesota’s Somali community, which Omar represents as the first Somali American elected to Congress.
“No matter what words Trump throws at me, I will not let that deter my work for the people of the Fifth District,” Omar said. “Trump should know by now that he should never pick a fight with a Somali woman.”
As of now, no formal charges or findings related to the allegations have been announced, and any review remains in its preliminary stages.
Do you support removing members of congress who are foreign-born?
WASHINGTON — In a dramatic late-night vote, the Senate has passed the Born in America Act, a sweeping piece of legislation that would limit federal office eligibility to natural-born U.S. citizens. The bill, led by Senator John Neely Kennedy (R-LA), marks one of the most controversial reforms in recent political history and immediately sparked constitutional questions from both sides of the aisle.
The measure passed 51–49, with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote. Its language bans naturalized citizens — as well as anyone who has ever held dual citizenship — from serving in Congress, the Cabinet, federal agencies, or the federal judiciary.
Kennedy’s Closing Argument
Senator Kennedy framed the bill as an extension of existing constitutional requirements for the presidency. In his final remarks before the vote, he argued that the nation should require “undivided allegiance” from all federal officeholders. Supporters described the bill as a safeguard; critics called it exclusionary and unprecedented.
Immediate Administrative Fallout
According to officials on Capitol Hill, the law took effect immediately at midnight, prompting agencies to begin reviewing personnel lists for compliance. Early reports indicated that several lawmakers and appointed officials left the floor during the night session, though the final number remains contested.
The legislation includes a 72-hour compliance window, requiring individuals who fall under the new restrictions to resign or challenge their status through formal legal channels. The Department of Justice has not yet commented on how enforcement procedures will be implemented or how disputes will be resolved.
White House Reaction
President Donald Trump celebrated the bill’s passage on social media moments before it became law, calling it “one of the biggest wins for American governance.” The post quickly went viral, drawing both praise and criticism from political leaders and legal scholars.
Legal and Constitutional Questions Ahead
Civil liberties groups and constitutional experts have already signaled forthcoming court challenges, arguing that the bill conflicts with existing constitutional protections and long-standing interpretations of eligibility for public office. They warn that the legislation could trigger a high-stakes legal battle likely to reach the Supreme Court.
Supporters of the act counter that Congress has the authority to set eligibility standards for federal employment and elected office beyond the presidency.
A Deeply Divided National Reaction
May you like
While some Americans see the law as reinforcing national sovereignty, others view it as a dramatic shift away from the nation’s history of welcoming naturalized citizens into full civic participation. Policy analysts expect months of litigation, injunction requests, and heated political debate.
For now, Washington enters a new and uncertain chapter as agencies scramble to interpret and implement the sweeping requirements of the Born in America Act.
