HOLY SMOKES: Greg Gutfeld Goes HAYWIRE on Lunatic Jessica Tarlov… ps
HOLY SMOKES: Greg Gutfeld Goes HAYWIRE on Lunatic Jessica Tarlov…
Federal immigration enforcement and Democrat hypocrisy collided on national television this week during a fiery exchange on Fox News’ The Five, where host Greg Gutfeld dismantled left wing talking points surrounding recent violence in Minneapolis and renewed ICE operations.
The confrontation unfolded as co host Jessica Tarlov raised concerns about the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti during unrest tied to federal immigration enforcement actions in Minnesota.
Gutfeld rejected the framing outright, accusing Democrats and their media allies of ignoring years of deadly consequences caused by open border policies while suddenly expressing outrage only when federal agents act.
“Nothing you said matters,” Gutfeld told Tarlov on air, dismissing her attempt to contextualize the violence.
Tarlov insisted the issue mattered to millions of Americans, a claim Gutfeld sharply disputed as detached from reality.
Gutfeld argued that the chaos now gripping Minneapolis did not emerge in a vacuum but was the direct result of Democrat immigration policies that allowed millions to enter the country unlawfully.
“How did we get here?” Gutfeld asked, pointing directly to the Biden era border surge and years of Democrat resistance to enforcement.
When Tarlov mockingly suggested that Pretti “snuck right through the border,” Gutfeld paused before launching into a devastating indictment of selective outrage.
He cited a long list of American women murdered by illegal aliens over the past eight years, including Jocelyn Nungaray, Laken Riley, Rachel Morin, and Mollie Tibbetts.
Gutfeld said those names were ignored or mocked by the same political class now condemning ICE agents.
He held up what he described as three pages of victims, emphasizing that these deaths occurred while the media dismissed warnings about border security.
The Fox News host accused Democrats of caring more about optics and rhetoric than about public safety or victims’ families.
He compared their posture to someone criticizing cleanup efforts after having created the mess themselves.
Gutfeld said the sudden moral outrage over language used by ICE agents rang hollow after years of silence on violence tied to illegal immigration.
He further pointed to Minneapolis as a case study in failed sanctuary policies, noting that the city experiences significantly higher violent crime rates than larger non sanctuary cities.
“Why is there so much violence in Minneapolis and not Texas?” Gutfeld asked, challenging Democrats to explain disparities they routinely ignore.
He accused the left of performative ignorance, claiming they refuse to confront the predictable consequences of their policies.
According to Gutfeld, Democrats only become animated when tragedy can be leveraged for political gain.
He argued that the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti were seized upon not out of concern but out of opportunity.
“This is what creates the motivation for this drama,” Gutfeld said, suggesting the cycle would repeat.
The exchange comes as ICE ramps up enforcement actions under President Donald Trump, who returned to office pledging to restore border security and law enforcement authority.
Trump has publicly defended ICE agents and dismissed Democrat accusations of brutality as politically motivated.
Polling consistently shows strong public support for immigration enforcement, a reality Gutfeld said Democrats refuse to acknowledge.
“People voted for the law,” he said. “They want the law.”
Gutfeld also rejected media comparisons to historical atrocities, saying such rhetoric cheapens real suffering while shielding policy failures.
He noted that dozens of detainees died under the Obama administration without triggering similar outrage from the press.
The broader context includes renewed scrutiny of Minnesota following major fraud cases, including the Feeding Our Future scandal that resulted in dozens of convictions.
Federal prosecutors have described that case as one of the largest pandemic fraud schemes in U.S. history.
Critics argue lax oversight and ideological resistance to enforcement created an environment ripe for abuse.
Gutfeld’s remarks echoed a growing conservative consensus that enforcement is not the problem but the solution.
He closed by stating bluntly that he no longer cares about left wing performances or accusations.
“If you want to cry about murderers and rapists,” he said, “do it on your own time.”
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…
Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.
“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.
Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.
“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.
Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.
What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.
In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.
Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.
May you like
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.
